PT128.S3.Q9 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The commercial concludes that consumers should choose their product over the competitor’s. As support, the commercial states that both products use the same active ingredients, but their product contains the active ingredients in higher concentrations. Higher concentrations have been proven to be safe, and faster relief is better, so people should use their product.

From the fact that their product contains a higher concentration of an active ingredient, the commercial makes the assumption that the product will provide faster relief. The connection between concentration of active ingredients and speed of relief is unsupported.

From the argument, we know that faster relief is preferable, but we don’t have a reason to believe that the advertised product will be faster.

This is descriptively inaccurate. The argument does not assume a connection between higher concentrations of active ingredients and product effectiveness. Rather, it assumes a link between higher concentration and faster relief.

This is descriptively inaccurate. None of the evidence used in the argument is impossible to prove.

This is descriptively inaccurate. The commercial does not attack the source of the competitor’s claims. The commercial just tries to establish that their product is preferable to their competitor’s product.

This is descriptively inaccurate. The commercial isn’t making an argument based on emotions; the argument is based on factual information.

This is the assumption made in the argument. We know that their product has a higher concentration, and we know that faster relief is always better, but there is no reason to believe that their product will provide that faster relief.

PrepTest 128 - Section 3 - Question 9

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action