Carla: Professors at public universities should receive paid leaves of absence to allow them to engage in research. ████████ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ███ ████ ████████ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███████
██████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ███ █████ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██ █████████ ███ ██████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ██████ ████ ███ ████ █████████
David implied conclusion is that what Carla says is questionable. As support for this implied conclusion, David questions the value of professors taking leaves from teaching in order to do research.
David’s question of why universities should dedicate their limited resources to giving professors paid leaves of absence to do research is answered in Carla’s argument when she says “research not only advances human knowledge, but also improves professors’ teaching.”
David's response to Carla is ████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██
ignores the part ██ ███████ ███████ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ████████
takes for granted ████ ███ ████ ████████ ██ █ ██████████ █████████ ██ ████████
incorrectly takes Carla's ███████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████ ████ ███ █████
takes for granted ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ███████
presumes, without providing ██████████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ █████████