PT130.S2.P2.Q8

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 4 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

The author doesn’t indicate that Emeagwali has helped solve a “wide array of real-world problems that supercomputers cannot solve.” Rather, the passage discusses Emeagwali’s successful modeling of oil field flow. It also discusses Emeagwali’s predictions for future problems that can be solved. But we don’t get evidence Emeagwali has helped solve a “wide array” of problems.

This doesn’t capture the passage’s focus on Emeagwali’s design of a parallel computing system. The main point isn’t about how Emeagwali shows us a broader point about paradigms and solutions. The main point is about Emeagwali and his achievements.

The passage never suggests that Emeagwali discovered the basic math principles underlying natural systems. His designs are based off of natural systems, but this doesn’t imply that he discovered basic math principles.

The main point is about Emeagwali’s achievements, not on what other scientists are more likely to do in the future. Although the passage does note that Emeagwali believes that scientists will increasingly look to nature for solutions to technological problems, Emeagwali’s belief isn’t the overall point of the passage.