Otis: Aristotle's principle of justice says that we should treat relevantly similar cases similarly. ██████████ ██ ██ █████ ███ █ ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███████████ ██ ████ █ ██████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ███ ██████ █████
█████ █ ██████ ███████████ █████████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ████████ ███████ ██████ ████ ███████ ███████████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ██ █████
Otis concludes that it’s wrong for a dentist to schedule an after-hours appointment for a family friend but not to do it for someone else. This is because Aristotle’s principle of justice says that we should treat relevantly similar cases similarly. Otis’s assumption is that the case of a family friend and the case of someone else are relevantly similar.
Tyra concludes that dentists’ treating friends differently from others does not violate Aristotle’s principle of justice. This is because friends are those for whom we do special favors.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether it’s wrong for dentists to schedule after-hours appointments for friends, but not for others. They also disagree about whether the case of friends and others are relevantly similar.
It can be inferred on ███ █████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ███████
Aristotle's principle of ███████ ██ ██████ ██████████
situations involving friends ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ █████
human nature makes ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███████ █████ █████████
dentists should be ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ███ ████
Aristotle recognizes that ██████████ █████████ ███████ █████████ ███████