Otis: Support Aristotle's principle of justice says that we should treat relevantly similar cases similarly. ββββββββββ ββ ββ βββββ βββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββ β ββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββ
βββββ β ββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββ βββββ
Otis concludes that itβs wrong for a dentist to schedule an after-hours appointment for a family friend but not to do it for someone else. This is because Aristotleβs principle of justice says that we should treat relevantly similar cases similarly. Otisβs assumption is that the case of a family friend and the case of someone else are relevantly similar.
Tyra concludes that dentistsβ treating friends differently from others does not violate Aristotleβs principle of justice. This is because friends are those for whom we do special favors.
Weβre looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether itβs wrong for dentists to schedule after-hours appointments for friends, but not for others. They also disagree about whether the case of friends and others are relevantly similar.
It can be inferred on βββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββ
Aristotle's principle of βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββ
situations involving friends βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ
human nature makes ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββββ
dentists should be βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββ
Aristotle recognizes that ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ