Chiu: Conclusion The belief that a person is always morally blameworthy for feeling certain emotions, such as unjustifiable anger, jealousy, or resentment, is misguided. ███████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████ ████ ██ █████ █████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ████████
Chiu concludes that, in feeling certain emotions, people’s morals aren’t always to blame. She supports this with an inference that people aren’t always responsible for certain emotions. This inference comes from the premises (two conditional statements).
The conclusion is about moral blame, but the support doesn’t discuss this. Chiu has successfully supported the inference that people aren’t responsible for certain emotions. This inference leads to the conclusion if we assume that if someone isn’t responsible for something, then they are not morally blameworthy.
Chiu's conclusion follows logically if █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Individuals do not ████ ███████ ████ █████ ███████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ █████████
If a person ██ ███████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ ███
Although a person ███ █████████ ██ █████████████ ██████ ████████ ██ ██████████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ ████████████
If an emotion ██ █████ █ ████████ ████████ ████ ████ ██████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ███
The emotions for █████ █ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ████████ ████████