PT131.S3.Q14 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The economist implicitly concludes that restricting imports to reduce a trade deficit won’t won't have an effect on the strength of the country's economy. She argues that this course of action would be just as ineffective as sticking a thermometer in cold water to lower someone’s fever. This is because, although a country’s trade deficit may indicate economic weakness, the trade deficit does not in itself weaken the country’s economy.

The economist uses an analogy to show that restricting imports to reduce a trade deficit won’t strengthen the economy because the trade deficit isn’t causing economic weakness. She compares it to the pointless act of sticking a thermometer in cold water to lower a fever, suggesting that restricting imports would be just as useless.

The economist never points out a crucial assumption in someone else’s argument, nor does she point out any falsehoods.

The economist uses an analogy, but not in the way that (B) describes. (B) suggests that the economist is showing that someone else’s analogy used to support their conclusion is flawed. This is not the case. Instead, she draws her own analogy to support her own conclusion.

The economist uses an analogy to show that one course of action (restricting imports to reduce a trade deficit) would be just as futile as another course of action (sticking a thermometer in a cold water to lower a fever).

The economist doesn’t question the authority of anyone making any claims. She doesn’t actually challenge any claims at all.

The economist shows that a particular course of action would be useless. She doesn’t necessarily challenge a “recommended” course of action, and she certainly doesn’t claim that it would have disastrous consequences.

PrepTest 131 - Section 3 - Question 14

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action