A university psychology department received a large donation from a textbook company after agreeing to use one of the company's books for a large introductory course. ███ ██████████ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████████ █████ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ██ ████ ███████ █████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████████████ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███████
The department chair claims that a psychology textbook was chosen for purely academic reasons, despite coming with a large donation from the publisher. Her evidence is that the department’s textbook committee gave the textbook the highest rating.
The department chair assumes that the department’s textbook committee wasn’t affected by the donation. She also assumes that either no other textbook also received the highest rating, or else she would have to explain why this particular textbook was chosen over another textbook of comparable merit.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███████ █████████
The members of ███ ████████ █████████ ████ █████████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████████ █ █████ █████████
The department has █ █████████████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████████ ████ ███████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ███████
In the previous █████ █ █████████ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████
The department chair ██ ███ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████████
The textbook company ████ ███ █████████ ████ █████████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ████ ███ ███ ██████