To study centuries-old earthquakes and the geologic faults that caused them, seismologists usually dig trenches along visible fault lines, looking for sediments that show evidence of having shifted. ███
Intro topic ·Methods for studying causes of past earthquakes
Start by looking for buried sediments that shifted during a possible earthquake
Explain method ·Use carbon 14 to back-date when material shifted (i.e., when possible earthquake occurred)
Carbon 14 is a radioactive form of carbon that decays (i.e., turns into a different form of carbon) at a known rate, so the amount of carbon 14 left in something can tell us how old that thing is
Explain new method ·Use lichen growth to back-date rockfalls in mountain ranges
Lichens begin growing on rocks after an earthquake causes rockfalls; because they grow at a known rate, the size of a lichen patch on a rock can tell us when that rock first fell
Carbon 14 dating is less accurate because it can be hard to know how much carbon 14 the material started with (just knowing the rate of carbon 14 decay on its own can't tell us how old that material is)
Limitations of lichenometry ·Limited time period, complications related to site selection
Passage Style
Single position
7.
The passage indicates that using ███████████ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ███████████ ███ ██ ██████████ ███ ██
Question Type
Stated
The author describes what makes radiocarbon dating past earthquakes potentially unreliable in the last paragraph: “because the amount of the carbon 14 isotope varies naturally in the environment depending on the intensity of the radiation striking Earth's upper atmosphere.”
a
the multiplicity of ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ ███████ ████████
This isn’t what the author identifies as what makes radiocarbon dating potentially unreliable.
b
the variable amount ██ ███████ █████████ ██████ ██ ███████ █████████
This isn’t what the author identifies as what makes radiocarbon dating potentially unreliable.
c
the fact that █████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████
This isn’t what the author identifies as what makes radiocarbon dating potentially unreliable.
d
the fluctuations in ███ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ ████
Supported.
e
the possibility that █████████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ ██████████
This isn’t what the author identifies as what makes radiocarbon dating potentially unreliable.
Difficulty
92% of people who answer get this correct
This is a low-difficulty question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%120
130
75%143
Analysis
Stated
Science
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
0%
151
b
1%
156
c
2%
152
d
92%
163
e
4%
158
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.