The work of South African writer Ezekiel Mphahlele has confounded literary critics, especially those who feel compelled to draw a sharp distinction between autobiography and fiction. ███
Intro topic ·Writer Ezekiel Mphahlele and how to classify his work
If critics who want a sharp distinction between autobiography and fiction are "confounded" by Mphahlele, then Mphahlele's work probably doesn't fit those categories
Author's explanation of Mphahlele's motivation ·Social ideals underlie his work
Unclear what "humanist" and "integrationist" mean, but they're social ideals, and the author thinks they come through well in Mphahlele's writing; meanwhile, critics think Mphahlele's vision is incomplete
Contrast ·Mphahlele's views against critics' views mentioned earlier
Critics concerned with categorizing Mphahlele's work as autobiography (fact) v. fiction, but Mphahlele says there's no such thing as pure fiction or absolute fact in novels
Main point ·Mphahlele intentionally melds fact and fiction in order to get his social message across
Differences between autobiography and fictional novel don't matter
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Spotlight
4.
According to the passage, critics █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████
Question Type
Stated
We’re told about criticism of The Wanderers in the first and second paragraphs. In the first paragraph, we’re told that critics think it is too autobiographical. In the second paragraph, we’re told that one critic thinks it doesn’t meet the requirements of great literature, and other critics think it contains too many autobiographical elements.
a
It should not ████ ████ █████████ ████ ██████████ ███████████
This is supported by a line in the middle of the second paragraph: “there are those who are outright dismissive of The Wanderers because it contains an autobiographical framework and is populated with real-world characters.” This indicates that critics thought the novel would have been better if it didn’t have an autobiographical framework and wasn’t populated with real-world characters.
b
It should have ████ █████████ ██ ██ ██████████████
(B) twists the critics’ opinion. They think the novel had too many autobiographical elements. That doesn’t mean they think the novel should have been called or presented as an autobiography. Instead, the critics may have preferred that the novel simply remove the autobiographical elements.
c
It does not ███████ ███████ ███████████ ███████
The last sentence of the second paragraph tells us that critics didn’t like how Mphahlele’s work didn’t provide a “road map” for bringing his vision about. But that doesn’t mean they think Mphahlele’s work didn’t display a vision. They saw Mphahlele’s vision, but just didn’t see a way to get there.
d
It intends to ███████ █████████████ ██████ ███████████
We’re not told that critics dismissed Mphahlele’s work because it delivered social criticisms. They didn’t have a problem with the fact that he criticized society, only with the lack of a road map to get to Mphahlele’s vision of the future.
e
It places too ████ ████████ ██ ██████████████
This isn’t listed as one of the reasons critics dismissed The Wanderers. The critics didn’t have a problem with the presence of relationships in the work; they didn’t like that these relationships involved autobiographical elements.
Difficulty
87% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%125
139
75%153
Analysis
Stated
Art
Critique or debate
Spotlight
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
87%
165
b
10%
160
c
2%
158
d
0%
151
e
0%
157
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.