Ecologists predict that Support the incidence of malaria will increase if global warming continues or if the use of pesticides is not expanded. βββ βββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ
Parallel questions have a highly regimented theory and approach β even if your core logical intuitions are very strong, following a routine process specifically built around the LSATβs unique patterns will dramatically reduce the time and mental energy required to identify the correct answer. So review these lessons. Theyβre important.
In short, though, our approach will be to develop an abstract model of the stimulusβ argument, preserving the structure but not the subject matter, then take a shallow dip into the answer choices looking for structural mismatches. Usually that suffices to identify the correct answer, but sometimes weβll need a deep dive to distinguish between the (usually just two) answer choices that remain after our shallow dip.
Thereβs lots of moving pieces in this argument. Itβs a bit like a sciencey RC passage, where thereβs a lot of β and β and good and bad to track. And just like in RC, itβll be super important to actually track it all in this question, tedious though it might be. In my opinion, the ideal approach to this question involves, at minimum, a few written notes to nail down the stimulusβ narrative. We can also borrow the RC technique of heightening the drama here β the goodness and badness of concepts gets a lot easier to track when you let the content hit you in the feely feels.
So take time up front to build your high-drama template for the stimulus, then evaluate each answer choice by plugging concepts into the template, trying to match the drama. Iβll walk you through a high-drama reading first, then give another summary focused on structure, then finally a template preserving the drama. Hereβs the high-drama reading:
Malaria will go β (bad!) if global warming continues or pesticides donβt go β. But if pesticides do go β (which would be goodβ¦), that would cause more global warming (oh no! that would be bad!). So malaria is gonna go β (bad!).
Now the summary focused on structure:
Thereβs a bad thing weβre hoping to prevent (Malariaβ). Either of two triggers would suffice to make the bad thing happen (Global Warming or /Pesticidesβ). But oh no! If we try to block one of the triggers (Pesticidesβ), thatβll activate the other trigger (Global Warming). So the bad thing is gonna happen for sure (Malariaβ).
Now the template into which weβll plug each answer choice:
Bad Thing: exists
Two Triggers: each suffices to make the bad thing happen
But Oh No!: blocking one trigger activates the other
Conclusion: bad thing is gonna happen for sure
Analysis by MichaelWright
The pattern of reasoning in βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ
The crime rate ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ
If educational funds ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ
If interest rates ββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ
If global warming βββββββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ
If deforestation continues ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ