PT133.S3.Q1

PrepTest 133 - Section 3 - Question 1

Show summary

Commentator: In last week's wreck involving one of Acme Engines' older locomotives, the engineer lost control of the train when his knee accidentally struck a fuel shut-down switch. ████ ██████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ████ █ ██████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ██ █████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████████ ████ ████ █████████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████ ████ ██████ █████████████ ████████ ██ ██ ████████ ████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ███████████ ██████ ███████ ██ ██████████████ █████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████

Summarize Argument

The commentator concludes that Acme Engines should be liable for the recent wreck. Despite what the company says, Acme Engines likely knew that knee-height switches were a safety hazard, given that they spent $500,000 to relocate the switches in newer locomotives.

Identify Argument Part

The referenced text is a premise of the argument. The author provides it as evidence that Acme Engines knew the switches were a safety hazard.

Show answer
1.

The point that Acme Engines █████ ████████ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ███████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █████████████ ████████ ██

a

proof that the ████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███ █████ █████

b

a reason for █████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ █████████ █████ █████ ███████████

c

an explanation of ███ ███ █████ █████ ████████

d

evidence that knee-level ████████ ███ ███ ██ ████ █████████

e

an indication that ████ ███████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ ████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?