Panelist: Support Medical research articles cited in popular newspapers or magazines are more likely than other medical research articles to be cited in subsequent medical research. █████ ██ ███████ ████ ███████ ████████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ███ ██ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████████
The author concludes that medical researchers’ judgments of the importance of prior research is influenced by the publicity received by that research. This is based on the fact that research articles cited in popular newspapers or magazines are more likely to be cited in later medical research.
The author overlooks alternate explanations for the correlation between being cited in popular newspapers/magazines and being cited in later medical research. One potential explanation is that the importance of research leads both to increased citation in popular newspapers/magazines and to increased citation in later medical research.
The panelist's argument is most ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██
presents counterarguments to █ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████████
fails to consider ███ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ██ █ ████ ███ ██ ███████████ ███ ████ █████████ ███████ ████████ ████████
takes for granted ████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ █████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████████ ████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ████████
fails to consider ███ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ████ █ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ████████
draws a conclusion ████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████