As part of an international effort to address environmental problems resulting from agricultural overproduction, hundreds of thousands of acres of surplus farmland throughout Europe will be taken out of production in coming years. ███
Problem and Solution ·Problem: overproduction / solution: let farms lie fallow
We're farming too hard and that's harming the environment. Solution is to let farms sit there and don't plant anything.
Problem Details ·Too few nutrients; too much fertilizer
Farming depleted nutrients and introduced fertilizers. That makes it difficult to restore the land to "natural balance of flora." In particular, thistles (a weed) will crowd out other flora.
Experimental Setup ·Control v. intervention groups
Two control groups: (C1) lie fallow and (C2) grow corn. Two intervention groups: (I1) grow mixture of native flora and (I2) grow native flora plus clover and toadflax.
(C3) grow mixture of native flora and mix in 20 years recovered soil. This intervention group is meant to test whether microorganisms in the soil would have beneficial effects.
The author provides the answer in the middle of P3. The plots grown using the enriched soil were likely “overrun with aggressive disease organisms” while beneficial microorganisms were “lacking.” On the other hand, the plots that had been out of production for 20 years likely had a better balance of microorganisms. They didn’t have as many disease organisms and had more of the beneficial microorganisms.
a
Land that has ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████
The author doesn’t suggest that land farmed for many years lacks certain nutrients. The suggested explanation is that this land has too many disease organisms and not enough beneficial microorganisms.
b
Land that has ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████
Supported. The plots grown using the enriched soil (which is the same land that has been farmed for many years) were likely “overrun with aggressive disease organisms” while beneficial microorganisms were “lacking.”
c
Land that has ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ████ █████████ ██ ██████████████████
Overfertilization isn’t presented as the difference between growth patterns on different kinds of land in the study. The suggested explanation is that land that has been farmed for many years has too many disease organisms and not enough beneficial microorganisms.
This is anti-supported. The land that had been farmed for many years was lacking in beneficial organisms. But the land that was taken out of production likely had more of the beneficial organisms, which is why plants grew better on this land. So the soil that was taken from the land that had been out of production likely had beneficial organisms; it’s just that this addition wasn’t enough to make the land that had been farmed for many years healthier than the land that had been out of production for 20 years.
This confuses which land was overrun with harmful organisms. The land that had been farmed for many years was overrun with harmful organisms. The land that had been taken out of production wasn’t overrun with harmful organisms. So the soil that was taken from the land that had been out of production likely didn’t have many harmful organisms.
Difficulty
72% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%143
154
75%165
Analysis
Stated
Problem-analysis
Science
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
4%
159
b
72%
166
c
3%
156
d
19%
161
e
2%
159
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.