Most people acknowledge that not all governments have a moral right to govern and that there are sometimes morally legitimate reasons for disobeying the law, as when a particular law prescribes behavior that is clearly immoral. ββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββ ββββββ ββ β ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ β βββββ ββββ ββ ββββ β βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ
Most people's perspective Β·Moral duty to obey law because it's law; some rare exceptions
Commentators' perspective Β·Reject PA because PA has 2 implications that are absurd
PA allegedly implies (1) all governments are morally equal, and (2) people are morally allowed to do whatever they want (kill people, commit fraud, etc.)
Deny implication 2 Β·PA doesn't have to think people can do whatever they want
People still have moral duties not to harm others (a duty that doesn't stem from law). Also, There's a moral duty to help others, which might justify supporting government policies/actions. And, there's a moral duty to follow laws if failing to follow them leads to harm.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
27.
In the passage, the author βββββ βββββββββ ββ
Question Type
Implied
Purpose of passage
The authorβs purpose in writing this Critique passage is to present one groupβs criticisms of a particular theory, and then defend that theory against the criticisms.
a
describe the development βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββββ ββββββ
Even if we concede that the author describes the βtheoretical underpinningsβ of PA, he never describes the theoryβs development. We have no idea where it came from or how it might have developed.
b
establish that a ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ
The commentators argue that PAβs implications are βcounterintuitive.β The author rejects this argument, saying that PA doesnβt conflict with common sense in the ways that the commentators claim. But he isnβt primarily seeking to establish that PA conforms to common sense; heβs just seeking to defend the theory.
c
argue that two βββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ
The commentators argue that PA has two problematic implications. The author rejects this claim, but not by arguing that the implications are morally acceptable. Instead, he defends PA by arguing that it doesnβt necessitate these implications at all.
The commentators criticize PA by arguing that it has two counterintuitive implications. The author seeks to defend PA by showing that it actually does not have these implications. He spends P2 and P3 showing that the commentatorsβ arguments are mistaken.
The author never suggests that the philosophical anarchists are aware of the theoryβs defects. Instead, he defends the theory by showing that it does not entail the two implications that the commentators attribute to it.
Difficulty
87% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
147
75%156
Analysis
Implied
Purpose of passage
Critique or debate
Law
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
2%
151
b
5%
160
c
4%
155
d
87%
164
e
2%
151
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.