Wrong trigger and wrong conclusion. The premises never mention whether regulations would need to restrict people’s access to accurate information. The conclusion also makes no mention of whether it’s possible to implement regulations, just that ideally they should be in place.

(B) would weaken the argument by implying that regulations would not succeed in their goal of distinguishing accurate from inaccurate information.

(C) bridges the gap between regulations and distinguishing accurate from inaccurate information, so it strengthens the conclusion. Unlike many other PSAr questions, this answer choice doesn’t fully prove the conclusion, as it still doesn’t clarify whether we should do this. It still supports the conclusion far more than any other answer, however, so it is our best option.

Wrong trigger and wrong conclusion. The premises only tell us that accurate and inaccurate information are hard to distinguish, not whether accurate information is ever overlooked. This would also only allow us to conclude that people shouldn’t have access to vast amounts of misinformation, which provides no connection to regulation.

(E) weakens the argument by implying that regulations are bad. We want to prove that we do want regulations, not that we don’t.