Mismatched conclusion. The evidence is only about book reviewers’ opinions of the book, whereas the conclusion is about the opinion of the average reader. The stimulus does not shift from evidence about test pilots to a conclusion about all pilots, so (A) doesn’t match.

Mismatched conclusion. The evidence is only about book reviewers’ opinions of the book, whereas the conclusion is about the opinions of most people. The stimulus does not shift from evidence about test pilots to a conclusion about all pilots, so (B) doesn’t match.

Mismatched premises. (C) only mentions two reviewers before concluding that a future review will share the same opinion. The stimulus, however, tells us that many pilots didn’t find the plane difficult to operate, so (C) doesn’t match.

(D) proceeds by making a future prediction based on past results: Many reviewers read the new novel, and none of them enjoyed it, so the reviewer from the paper will not enjoy it.

Mismatched conclusion. The evidence is only about book reviewers’ opinions of the book, whereas the conclusion is about the opinions of the general public. The stimulus does not shift from evidence about test pilots to a conclusion about all pilots, so (E) doesn’t match.