The characteristic smell or taste of a plant, to insects as well as to humans, depends on its chemical composition. ███████ █████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███
███████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ █ █████ ████ ██ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████ ███
███ ████████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████████████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ██████ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████ █████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████ █ ███ ██ ████████ █ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ██ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████ ███████ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ██████████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███████████ █████ ███ █████ ██████ ████ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ███████ ███ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ███████ ███ █████ ███████████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███████
Based on the passage, the ██████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ █████ ███ ████████████ ███████ ██████ ███ ████████
The diversity of █████████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ █ █████ ██████████ ██ ████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ████████████ ████████
Not supported, because we don’t know about any “proportional” relationship in plants and insects. The passage doesn’t suggest that the greater the number of insects interacted with, the more secondary substances a plant develops. For example, would a plant that has interacted with 10 species of insects have more secondary substances than a plant that has interacted with 9? We have no evidence of this relationship.
Although few species ██ ██████ ████ █████████ ████ ████████████ ███████████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████ ███████ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ █████████
Not supported, because the author never suggests that only “few” species of plants have benefited from insects. We have no reason to think the proportion of plants that have benefited from insects of limited; it could be that all plants have benefited from insects.
Throughout the process ██ ████████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████████
Not supported, because we have no evidence either that the number of species per family has gone up or that the number of families has gone down.
No particular secondary █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████ ██ ████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██████████ █████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ █ █████ ████████
Supported, because we know that secondary substances appear
While many species ██ ███████ ████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████████ ███████ ████████ █████████ ████ ███ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ████████ ██ ███████ █████████ ███████████
Not supported. We have no reason to think no insect has ever developed immunity to a secondary substance. The author never says she provides an exhaustive list of all potential defense mechanisms. So the fact she doesn’t mention immunity doesn’t imply that no insects have developed immunity.