PT138.S1.P3.Q16 > Analytics

Hide analysis

David Warsh's book describes a great contradiction inherent in economic theory since 1776, when Adam Smith published . ███ ██████ ██ ████████ █████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ █████

Intro topic · Warsh's book about conflict between Pin Factory and Invisible Hand

Conflict was part of economic theory since Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.

Pin Factory · Increased efficiency through increased size

Pin factory's employees can make more by specializing on narrow tasks.

Invisible Hand · Acting out of self-interest can lead to common good

█████ ███ █████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ████ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ███ █████████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██████ █ ███████ ████████ ██████ █████████ ███████ █ █████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██████ █████ ███ █████ █████ █████ ████ █ █████ █████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████████ ██████ █████ ████ ██ █████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ █████████ █████ ████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ████ █ ███ ████████ ███ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ████ ███████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ████ ██████ ███ █████ ████████ ██████ ███

Conflict · Increasing returns from scale (Pin factory) leads to monopoly, which means Invisible Hand doesn't work

Invisible Hand requires many competitors in an industry.

██████████ ███ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ████████████ ███ ███████████

Assumption underlying idea that free markets always get it right · Returns to scale are diminishing, not increasing

This assumption is the opposite of the Pin Factory model.

███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ █████████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ ██████████████ ████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ██████ █████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ████████████ ███████████ █████████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ████ ████████████ █████ █████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██████████ █████ █████ ██ ██████████ █████████████ ███ █████████████ ███████████ ████ ██ █████████ ███████████████

Why Pin Factory was de-emphasized · The model of diminishing returns was easier to represent mathematically

The Pin Factory model was more difficult to represent mathematically.

████ ██████████ █████ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ██████████ ███████ █████████ █████████████ ████ ████████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ █████ █████ █████ ██████████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████████████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ████████████

Pin Factory now mainstream · Once it could be described with enough math rigor, Pin factory entered mainstream

Passage Style

Single position

Spotlight

16.

The author's attitude towards the ████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ██

Question Type

Author’s attitude

Implied

What’s the author’s attitude toward the Pin Factory becoming part of mainstream thought? The author notes that the model of the Pin Factory “obviously” characterized many enterprises. So the author probably thinks it’s good that the Pin Factory became part of mainstream thought, since it describes at least part of the world accurately.

hostility

There’s no evidence of a negative attitude toward the Pin Factory model.

uncertainty

There’s no evidence of uncertainty toward the Pin Factory model. The author notes that the model of the Pin Factory “obviously” characterized many enterprises. So the author probably thinks it’s good that the Pin Factory became part of mainstream thought.

curiosity

There’s no evidence the author is curious about the Pin Factory’s becoming part of economic thought. She doesn’t ask more questions about it or suggest that there’s some mystery or further issues to investigate.

indifference

“Indifference” suggests the author doesn’t care about the Pin Factory becoming part of economic thought. This doesn’t fit, because the author has at least a slightly positive attitude toward this issue. After all, the author notes that the model of the Pin Factory “obviously” characterized many enterprises. So the author probably thinks it’s good that the Pin Factory became part of mainstream thought.

10%

receptivity

This is the best answer. The author notes that the model of the Pin Factory “obviously” characterized many enterprises. So the author probably thinks it’s good that the Pin Factory became part of mainstream thought.

72%

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 138 - Section 1 - Passage 3 - Question 16

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 138 - Section 1 - Passage 3 - Question 16

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?