PT138.S2.Q11 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The cartographer concludes that we shouldn’t think people aren’t misled by maps, even though they’re rarely misled by words. People are taught to be cautious about language, but there’s virtually no education about maps.

The referenced text supports the conclusion. It’s part of a distinction that shows why the fact that people are not generally misled by language doesn't necessarily imply that people are not generally misled by maps.

The cartographer is arguing that a certain conclusion can’t be drawn from the analogy between maps and language. The referenced text doesn’t clarify the meaning of the argument’s conclusion—it helps spell out why maps and language are dissimilar cases.

The referenced text isn’t a conclusion. There’s no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.

The referenced text distinguishes how people are educated in language from how people are educated in maps. In turn, this distinction supports the conclusion that we shouldn’t assume people won’t be misled by maps simply because they’re not misled by language.

Although the author points out that both maps and language can be manipulated to mislead, the referenced text isn't offered as support for that similarity. Rather, it points out a difference between maps and language.

The referenced text isn’t a conclusion. There’s no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.

PrepTest 138 - Section 2 - Question 11

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action