PT140.S1.Q11 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The author’s main conclusion is that increasing urbanization might reduce the total amount of pollution in the nation. This is because people in more urban areas tend to rely more on mass transit and live in more energy-efficient houses than people in more rural areas. The same number of people in an urban area will produce less pollution than the same number of people in a rural area.

The referenced text is the conclusion of the argument.

The referenced text is not a conclusion. Also, the author never suggests people should live in large cities.

The author concedes that large cities are generally more polluted than the countryside. This is not called into question by the author.

The referenced text is the conclusion.

The referenced text is the conclusion. The claim that large cities are more polluted than the countryside is a concession.

This accurately describes the role of the referenced text. It’s a conclusion supported by the claim that a given number of people will produce less pollution if concentrated in a large city than if dispersed among many small towns.

PrepTest 140 - Section 1 - Question 11

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action