PT141.S4.Q6 > Explanation

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

This doesn't tell us anything about the benefits or costs of the new drug, so whatever the answer might be, it wouldn't help us to evaluate the argument.

We already know that immune disorders are treated in such a way, and the "why" doesn't make a difference to the argument. This just doesn't tell us anything about the usefulness of this new drug.

While price is a type of cost, the clinician is focused on the medical cost-benefit, not the economic cost-benefit. Besides, "more" expensive doesn't tell us whether the new drug would actually strain patients' finances.

We’re not interested in the bone-preservation drug’s history unless that reveals something important about the new bone-growth drug, which this doesn't. This doesn't do anything to help evaluate the argument.

This would help to evaluate whether the new drug actually has benefits when used together with the old drugs. If the new drug would be ineffective, then the argument falls apart. But if it would still be effective, then the argument keeps its strength.

Was this helpful?

Pause (K)

Seek backward 10 seconds (J)

Seek forward 10 seconds (L)

Mute (M)

Keyboard shortcuts

Play/Pause

Seek backward 10 seconds

Seek forward 10 seconds

←

Seek backward 5 seconds

→

Seek forward 5 seconds

Mute/Unmute

↑

Volume up

↓

Volume down

Speed up

Speed down

Closed-Captions On/Off

Enter/Exit PIP

Enter/Exit Fullscreen

Closed-Captions On (C)

Speed

Enter PIP (I)

Enter Fullscreen (F)

Still confused about this question?

Live members can ask our 99th–percentile tutors for help.

PrepTest 141 - Section 4 - Question 6

Question explanation

Ask a tutor

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action