Editorial: Conclusion The government should not fund any part of its health services with lottery revenue. █████ ██████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ █ ██████ ██████████
The editorialist concludes that the government should not fund essential health services with lottery revenue. This is because lottery revenue may decline in the future.
The editorialist establishes that lottery revenue may not always be reliable, but assumes that this disqualifies it from being a revenue source for essential services like healthcare.
The argument conforms to the principle that only reliable sources of revenue should be used to fund essential government services.
The argument in the editorial ████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
Governments should spend ████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████████ █████████
Essential government services ████ ██ ██████ ████ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████
No government service ██████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ███ ███ ████████
Governments should consider ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████
At least some ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████