"Stealing thunder" is a courtroom strategy that consists in a lawyer's revealing negative information about a client before that information is revealed or elicited by an opposing lawyer. █████ █████ ██ ██ █████ ██ █████████ █ ████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ██ █████████ ██ █████ ████ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ █████ ██ ████ █████████
Intro topic ·Stealing thunder
Revealing negative information about one's own client in the courtroom before that information is revealed by the opponent. Many lawyers think this is a good idea if the opponent is likely to reveal the info.
Potential limit ·Stealing thunder might not work when info is extremely negative
The very negative info can create a negative framing for jurors, which they'll apply to what comes up in trial.
Passage Style
Single position
12.
The author discusses the " █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████ ██
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
The author discusses the “cognitive framework” to identify a factor that can influence the effectiveness of stealing thunder. Early positive framing can help guide the juror’s assessment of later information. But early negative framing can also influence a juror’s assessment in a that doesn’t help a lawyer’s client.
The author doesn’t indicate that jurors bring attitudes and biases into court. We know that they usually want to solidify their position regarding a case, but this doesn’t imply that they come into the case with any attitudes or biases. Also, the “cognitive framework” doesn’t relate to attitudes/biases jurors bring in from outside court.
The author never suggests that stealing thunder is best done as early as possible. Although it makes sense to think that this is a reasonable approach, the author never makes this point. So it can’t be the purpose of mentioning the “cognitive framework.”
The author never suggests that creating credibility is more effective than positive framing of negative information in some cases.
Difficulty
91% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%123
135
75%147
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Law
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
91%
164
b
2%
156
c
3%
157
d
1%
153
e
3%
161
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.