Political advertisement: Sherwood campaigns as an opponent of higher taxes. ███ ██ ███████ ███████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █████ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ███████ ████████████ █████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ ███ █████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ████████
The author’s implicit conclusion is that Sherwood is not an opponent of higher taxes. This is based on the fact that over the last 10 years, Sherwood has served on the city council, and the council has consistently increased taxes every year.
The author assumes that Sherwood isn’t an opponent of higher taxes because the council she served on voted for more taxes. This overlooks the possibility that Sherwood is an opponent of higher taxes, voted against higher taxes, but was simply outvoted by others on the council who favored more taxes.
The argument in the political █████████████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██
bases a crucial ██████████████ ██ █ ████ ███████ ██████
fails to consider ███ ███████████ ████ █████████ ████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███████████ ██ ███████████
mistakes something that ██ ██████████ ██ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████ ████ ██████
makes a personal ██████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ █ ███████ ████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ████ ████
takes for granted ████ █ ██████████████ ██ █ █████ ██ █ █████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████ █████