PT143.S2.P2.Q10 > Analytics

Hide analysis

The current approach to recusal and disqualification of judges heavily emphasizes appearance-based analysis. ████████████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ██████ ██████ ███████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████ █████ ████████████ █████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██ ████ ██████████████ ████████ █████ █ █████ ██ █ █████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████████████ ██ █ █████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ██████████████ ███ ██████████████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ███ █████ ██████

Intro to Topic · Judicial recusal

Currently, judges recuse themselves based on appearance of impropriety. Even if there's no real conflict of interest, as long as there is the appearance of impropriety, then they are expected to recuse themselves.

Criticism · Recusal rules are too vague

Criticism · Focus on appearance of bias instead of actual bias is a mistake

Actual bias is what matters. Focusing on appearance of bias may distract from noticing actual bias.

███ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ █████████ █████████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████ ██ ██ ██ ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ███ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ████████ █████ ████████ ████████████ ██ ██ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ █████████ ████████████ ████████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████████████████ ███████ ████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ █ ███████ ███████████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████ ███ █ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ ██ ███ █████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ███ █████ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ████████ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ████ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████ ████████ █████████ ████ █████

Proposed Solution · Transparent, written reasoning

If judge recuse, they should write out their reasons for recusing. If judge does not recuse, then write out their reasons for reaching their decision on the case.

Counterpoint · Written reason may be insincere

Real reason may be hidden.

Rebuttal · Doesn't matter

As long as impartial judges can read and agree with the explicit written reasoning, then whatever hidden real reasons don't matter.

Passage Style

Problem-analysis

Single position

10.

The author of the passage ███████ ███ █████ █████████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████ ██ ████ ████████ ███████████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██

Question Type

Author’s perspective

Implied

It’s difficult to predict the correct answer just based on the question stem. It’s clear that the author presents this legal principle as a response to those who might criticize the author’s recommendation because judges might hide their real reasoning. But let’s go into the answers with an open mind.

an established principle ██ ███

This is the best answer. The author treats this principle as established. She relies on it and doesn’t show any indication that it’s open to question.

79%

part of the ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███

There’s no evidence the author considers the principle “part of the definition” of the function of law. The author never mentions the function of law in the last paragraph.

a tool for ██████ ██ ████████ █████ ████ █████████

The author cites the legal principle as a response to those who believe judges might disguise their real reasoning. But the author doesn’t consider the principle itself to be a tool that allows judges to disguise their real reasoning.

unfair to parties ██ █████ ███████████

The author never suggests the legal principle is unfair. In fact, the author cites the rules to indicate that a result might not be unfair even if a judge has disguised real reasoning.

central to the ███████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ████

The author never connects the legal principle to the current approach to judicial bias (discussed in P1).

14%

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 143 - Section 2 - Passage 2 - Question 10

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 143 - Section 2 - Passage 2 - Question 10

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?