PT144.S3.Q18 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Anthropologists overrate the usefulness of field studies because, in the context of a field study, they underestimate how much their presence influences the community they’re studying.

The conclusion is a judgment on anthropologist’s general valuing of field studies: “the usefulness of field studies tends to be overrated by anthropologists.”

This rephrases the conclusion.

This is context. It explains what a field study is, which is a key concept in the overall argument.

This is context. It informs the relationship between field studies and anthropological research.

This is a concession. The author is acknowledging that anthropologist’s aren’t entirely ignorant of this effect.

This is a premise. It supports the conclusion that the usefulness of field studies is overrated by anthropologists.

PrepTest 144 - Section 3 - Question 18

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action