Critic: Conclusion The recent biography of Shakespeare does not explain what is of most interest about him. ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ███ ██ ████ █ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██ █ ███ ██ ████ █████ ███ ██ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ███████████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████████
The author concludes that the recent biography of Shakespeare does not explain what is most interesting about him. This is based on the fact that the biography doesn’t explain what made Shakespeare different from his contemporaries.
The conclusion asserts that the biography doesn’t explain what’s “most interesting” about Shakespeare. But the premise doesn’t tell us anything about the concept of what’s “most interesting” about Shakespeare. All that the premise establishes is that the biography doesn’t explain what made Shakespeare different from his contemporaries. The missing link is the assumption that what made Shakespeare different from his contemporaries IS the most interesting thing about Shakespeare.
The conclusion of the argument ███ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
There is no ███ ██ ████ ████ ████ ███████████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████████
The life of ███ ███████ ███ ██ ███████████ ███████ ██ ██████████████
Shakespeare was very █████████ ████ ███ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████
A biography should ██████ █████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ████████████
What is most ███████████ █████ ███████████ ██ ████ ████ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████████