Aisha: Conclusion Vadim is going to be laid off. ███████ ████ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ████ █████████ █████ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ██████████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███ █ ███████████ ███ ████ ████ ████████ ███████ █ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██████
The author concludes that Vadim, a programmer, is going to be laid off. This is based on the fact that his company has already decided to lay off a programmer, and the firm will follow the following rule in deciding who to lay off:
Most recently hired programmer → laid off
We know the company will lay off the most recently hired programmer. So to establish that Vadim will be laid off, we want to know that he is the most recently hired programmer.
Aisha's conclusion follows logically if █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
The firm values ██████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ████████
When Vadim was ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████████
Vadim is the ████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████
Every other programmer ██ ███ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████
It is bad ██████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ █████ ███████████