It is commonly assumed that even if some forgeries have aesthetic merit, no forgery has as much as an original by the imitated artist would. βββ
βββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ β βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ β ββββ ββββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββ
β ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββ β βββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ β βββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ β βββ βββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ
ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββ βββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ β βββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ
The passage most strongly supports βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ
In any historical βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ β ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ β βββββββ βββ ββ β ββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ
The author never suggests that the criteria for determining whether a work is a forgery is debated. Perhaps whether a particular work is a forgery is subject to debate, but we have no reason to think the criteria for determining that something is a forgery is debated.
An artist who ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ β βββββββ
The author doesnβt suggest that using techniques of others makes one likely to be a forger. One can use the techniques others developed while having an original vision. In addition, using techniques of others may imply that one uses non-original techniques, but this doesnβt imply that one creates forgeries. What if an artist doesnβt try to pass off the work as someone elseβs?
A successful forger ββββ βββββββββ β βββ ββββββββ βββββββ
Not supported, because one can be a successful forger simply by excelling aesthetically. Originality of vision is relevant to overall merit of a work, but this doesnβt imply originality is required for the aesthetic merit of a forgery.
Works of art βββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ β βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ
Not supported. Nothing the author says supports a comparison between the earlier and later works of an artist.
A painting can ββ β βββββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββ βββ β ββββ ββ β ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ
Supported by the fact that The Disciples at Emmaus is a forgery, even though it is not a copy a particular work. The author notes that the work is βpainted under the forged signature of the acclaimed Dutch master Jan Vermeer.β