PT145.S4.Q1 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The pundit predicts that Grenier will lose the mayoral election because she changed her stance on an issue, which will make the voters think she’s insincere.

The support establishes a potential problem that Grenier will face in her mayoral election—voters won’t believe that her change of heart was sincere. The support doesn’t, however, establish that this means that she’ll lose the election. That part is simply assumed.

To help justify this conclusion, we’re looking for a principle that confirms that a mayoral candidate who appears insincere to voters will probably lose.

The support establishes that most voters will perceive Grenier as insincere. (A) confirms that this means she probably won’t win them over.

This principle would hurt the argument, not help justify it. If voters were unlikely to notice her shift, then there’s less reason to believe that she’ll lose.

Irrelevant. We have no idea what the voters’ stances are on employee wages. We’re only told that they’re likely to see Grenier as insincere.

Irrelevant. We have no idea how voters feel about Grenier’s understanding of their financial concerns.

Irrelevant. We’re only told that voters will view Grenier as insincere, not that they don’t hold the same beliefs as her.

PrepTest 145 - Section 4 - Question 1

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action