PT145.S4.Q20 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The author’s conclusion means the following:

If we find out that Selena does have psychic powers, then we will determine that it’s possible to have psychic powers. And, if we find out that Selena does NOT have psychic powers, then we will determine that it’s NOT possible to have psychic powers.

This conclusion is based on nothing more than the fact that Selena claims to have psychic powers.

If Selena has psychic powers, then it’s inherently true that having psychic powers is possible.

But if Selena doesn’t have psychic powers, that doesn’t necessarily prove that it’s impossible to have psychic powers. After all, what if someone else besides Selena could have psychic powers.

So to make the argument valid, we want to establish that if Selena doesn’t have psychic powers, it’s impossible to have psychic powers. In other words, we want to know that nobody else can have psychic powers if Selena doesn’t have them.

(A) doesn’t establish that if Selena doesn’t have psychic powers, no one else can have them. Sure, no one else has “yet been found” to have them. But that doesn’t mean it’s impossible for others to have psychic powers.

(B) establishes that if Selena doesn’t have psychic powers, then it’s impossible to have psychic powers (think about the contrapositive of this answer). This supplies the missing piece of the argument; if we find out Selena’s claim is not true, we can determine that it’s not possible to have psychic powers.

Whether it’s possible to determine that Selena’s claim is true/false has nothing to do with what happens IF we find out her claim is true/false. Adding (C) to the argument still leaves us not knowing whether other people besides Selena can have psychic powers.

We want to prove that by finding out whether Selena’s claim is true, we WILL determine whether it’s possible to have psychic powers. In other words, we’ll find out that it’s possible or that it’s impossible. (D) is directed toward proving that we “will not know whether it is possible” to have psychic powers. Not knowing whether it’s possible is the opposite of what we want to establish.

(E) simply reverses the conclusion. (E) establishes that finding out whether Selena has psychic powers is necessary to determine whether it’s possible to have psychic powers. But we want to establish that it’s sufficient to determine whether it’s possible to have psychic powers.

Question

42% of people who answer get this correct

This is a very difficult question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 159

168

75% 177

Question Stem Tags

Sufficient assumption

Stimulus Tags

Conditional reasoning

Link assumption

Popularity Avg. score

18%

163

42%

168

19%

162

160

15%

160

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 145 - Section 4 - Question 20

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action