A remedy that courts sometimes use in disputes involving a breach of contract is simply to compel the participants in the contract to do precisely what they have agreed to do. ████████ ████████████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██ ████████ ██████████████ ███ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ █ █████████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████████████ ███ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ █████████ ███
███████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██████ ██ █ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████████████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██████ ████ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ███
█████████████ ██ ████ █████ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ██ █ █████████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ████████ ████████ ████████ ████████████ ██ █████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ██████ ██████████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███
The passage most strongly suggests ████ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
Courts should examine ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████████████████ █████ ██████ ████ ████████ ████████ ████████ ████████████
Specific performance is ███████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████
Although specific performance is appropriate for personal property that is “unique or of such subjective importance to the buyer that there is no way to assign an accurate financial measure of the buyer’s loss in not possessing the item,” we have no reason to think this circumstance is present in most cases involving contracts for sale of personal property.
In general, coercive █████████████ ████████ ██ ████████ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████
An award of monetary damages is also a coercive remedy. So it doesn’t make sense for the author to agree with (C). Although the author believes the “kind of coercion” that specific remedy involves is inappropriate for employment contracts, this doesn’t imply that monetary damages aren’t coercive.
Specific performance is ██████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ████ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ████
The author doesn’t suggest that specific performance can be successful only in these cases. For example, the author believes this remedy is appropriate when property is “unique” — regardless of the objective value of the property.
To provide fair ███████████ ██ ██████████ █████ ███████ ██████ █████ █████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██████████ ████████
Not supported. The author believes some remedies are more appropriate than others depending on the circumstances. So the author may want remedies limited to only one option, depending on the case.