Liang: Support Watching movies in which violence is portrayed as an appropriate way to resolve problems increases levels of aggression in viewers. ██████████ ██████████ ██████ ██ █████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███████████
██████ ████████ █ █████ █████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ █████ ██ █████████████ ██████ ███ ██ ███████████
Liang concludes that children’s access to certain violent movies should be restricted. This is because movies that treat violence as an appropriate way to resolve problems causes increased aggression in viewers.
Sarah concludes that access to dramas involving violence should not be restricted for mature audiences. This is because such dramas allow viewers to experience the emotions associated with aggression and to get rid of those emotions.
We’re looking for a point of agreement. The speakers agree that watching movie violence can have an effect on viewers. They don’t speak about the exact same effects, but they agree that there can be effects.
The dialogue provides the most ███████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ███ █████ █████ ████ ████ █████ ████
people who experience ██ ███████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ ██████████ ██ ████ ███████
the members of █ ██████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███ ██ ███████ ████████
if violence in ███████ ██████ ██████ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████ ██ █████ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████████
the effects of ████████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ █████████ ███ ██ █████ █████████ ██████████
children are more ██████ ████ ██████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ █████████