PT148.S1.Q19 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that Thompson is the best person to lead the nation out of the candidates running. This is based on the fact that Thompson is the only candidate who opposes higher taxes, whereas the others support them. And, many people agree that those who oppose higher taxes are better leaders than those who support them.

The author assumes that because many people believe something, it’s actually true. This overlooks the possibility that, even though many people think one who opposes higher taxes makes for a better leader than one who supports them, these people are just wrong. Opposition to higher taxes might not make one a better leader than one who supports them.

This directly undermines the assumption that what “many people agree” about is correct. If opposition to higher taxes doesn’t contribute to good leadership, then it’s not a relevant to a determination of which candidate would make for a better leader than another candidate.

The author never assumed that opposition is enough to guarantee good leadership; only that opposition to higher taxes makes one a better leader than those who support higher taxes. Even if opposition isn’t sufficient, it can still be a factor increasing one’s quality as a leader.

The author cites to what many people agree about as support for a rule that those who oppose higher taxes are better leaders than those who support them. So, other factors relating to other issues don’t affect the reasoning used by the author.

The author concludes that Thompson is the best person to lead out of the remaining candidates. This is a relative claim. Even if people who support higher taxes can perform adequately, the author can still prove that Thompson will be better.

The author cites to what many people agree about as support for a rule that those who oppose higher taxes are better leaders than those who support them. Other qualities of the candidates, such as potentially being hardworking, are not relevant to application of this rule.

PrepTest 148 - Section 1 - Question 19

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action