PT148.S2.P1.Q1 > Analytics

Hide analysis

The following passage is adapted from a journal article. ███

██ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ███

Intro topic · Rawl's theory of justice

We first need to understand what Rawls was reacting to.

███ ████████ ████████ ██ █████████ █████████ ██████████ ███ ███████████████ █████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████████ ████████████ ██ █████ ██████ ██████████████ █████ ████████████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████████████ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ███ █████████████ ███████ █████████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████ ███████ █ ████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████ █████████ ████████ █████ █████████████ ███████████ █ ███████████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███

What Rawls was reacting to · Utilitarianism

Philosophy that emphasized maximizing fulfillment of people's preferences. Utilitarianism led to strange results -- it supported executing an innocent person as long as the action increased total satisficaction.

█████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ███████████ █████ █████ ██ ██ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █ ███ █████ ███ ██ ████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████

Rawls's criticism · Utilitarianism wrongly endorses violating the liberty of the few for the good of the many

Rawls's alternative to utilitarianism · Justice is whatever arises from a fair procedure

(The author calls Rawls's theory "ingenious." This suggests a positive attitude.)

███ ████ ██ █ ████ ██████████ █████ █████ ███ █ ██████ █████████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ █ ████ █████ ███████████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████ ███ ████ ███ ████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ███ █████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ ██████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ███████████ ████ █████ ████ ███ ███████ █ ████ ███████ ███ ██ █████████

Elaborate on fair procedure · The veil of ignorance

If a child must cut a cake into slices to be divided among others, but doesn't know who will get which slice, he'll likely divide the cake into equal slices. In this way, ignorance about who gets which slice leads to a fair process for dividing the cake.

█████ ███████████ ███ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ ████████ █ ██████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ █████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ███████████████ ███ ██ ███ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███████████ █████████ ██ █████████████ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ █ ████████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ██████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ █ ████ ████████████

Elaborate on veil of ignorance · If people were ignorant about their own personal qualities, they'd devise a system where nobody loses

This arrangement would be a just system.

█████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ███████ ████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███ ██████████████ ███ ██████ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ████████ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ████ █████ ████ ████████ ██████ ███ ██ █████ █ ███████ ██████ ██ █████ ███████ ██████ ██████████████ ████ ██ ██ ██████████ █████████████████ █████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ █ ███████ █████ ██ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████

Assumptions underlying Rawls's theory · People want primary goods, and would agree that everyone should get a minimum of these goods

People in the "original position" -- the state of ignorance about their own personal qualities -- wouldn't want to lose out on the bare minimum level of primary goods. (The author says that this "unfortunately" is redistributionist. So, there's an aspect about Rawls's theory that the author doesn't like.)

Passage Style

Critique or debate

Problem-analysis

According to the passage, Rawls ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████

a thought experiment

We’re told that Rawls uses a “thought experiment.”

94%

a process of ███████████

The passage never states that Rawls uses process of elimination.

an empirical study ██ ██████ ████████████

The passage never states that Rawls uses an empirical study. We don’t get any description of data Rawls collected or used.

a deduction from █ ███ █████ ██████████

The passage never states that Rawls uses a deduction from a few basic principles. Rawls attempts to formulate principles of justice, but he doesn’t start with principles of justice and reach conclusions based on those principles.

a consideration of ███ ███████ ██ █████

The passage never states that Rawls uses the meaning of words as part of explaining his theory.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 148 - Section 2 - Passage 1 - Question 1

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 148 - Section 2 - Passage 1 - Question 1

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?