Support YXK is currently the television network with the highest overall number of viewers. βββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββββ
The argument begins by comparing sets, showing that one set has the most of something (among all TV networks, YXK has the most viewers). Then it compares members within that set (among YXKβs shows, Bliss has the most viewers). Finally, it concludes by comparing a member of that set to members of other sets (among all TV shows, Bliss has the most viewers).
This is a cookie-cutter whole-to-part flaw. The support is about whole sets (TV networks), while the conclusion is about the individual members of those sets (TV shows). But the number of viewers of a network as a whole doesnβt tell us whether one TV show in that network has the most viewers of any show. Itβs possible that a show on a different network is the show with the most viewers, even though YXK is the network with the most viewers. YXK might just have a larger number of shows with fewer viewers each.
The flawed reasoning exhibited by βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ
Soccer players suffer ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ
The argument begins by comparing sets, showing that one set has the most of something (among all sports, soccer has the most leg injuries). Then it compares members of that set (among all soccer players, Linda has had the most leg injuries). Finally, it concludes by comparing a member of that set to members of other sets (among all athletes, Linda has had the most leg injuries). This is the same whole-to-part flaw. Just because soccer has the most leg injuries doesnβt mean a soccer player has more than any other athlete.
Teachers at our ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ
Wrong flaw. This starts by comparing sets (schools) and then notes that one member of a set (Janna) has the most awards of any member of any of the sets. It then compares Janna to the other members of her set, concluding that she is the best. The stimulus, meanwhile, compares sets, then compares one member of a set to other members of that same set, and then shifts to a conclusion that compares members across different sets.
The Olson Motor βββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ
No flaw. This establishes that Olson makes the three best-selling models in the country. If the Decade is Olsonβs best-selling model, then it must also be the best-selling model in the country (since Olson makes the best-selling models in the country).
In this city βββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββ
Wrong flaw. This starts by comparing individual members across two sets (the highest- and lowest-paid police officers and the highest-and lowest-paid firefighters). It then shifts to a conclusion about the sets as a whole (police officers earn more, on average, than firefighters). (D) draws a conclusion about the whole from an argument about individual parts, while the stimulus draws a conclusion about a part from an argument about the whole.
Falling Fast is βββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ
Wrong flaw. This starts by comparing one member of a set (Falling Fast) to other members of that same set (other films). It then draws a conclusion about that member based on a general characteristic of the most successful films. This assumes that the film earning most at the box office is also the most successful film. The stimulus, meanwhile, starts by comparing multiple sets and then draws a conclusion that compares an individual member of one set to members of all the sets.