After a judge has made the first ruling on a particular point of law, judges must follow that precedent if the original ruling is not contrary to the basic moral values of society. ββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ β βββββ
Domain: judge has made first ruling on a particular point of law
If original ruling is not contrary to basic moral values of society β future judges must follow that precedent
Domain: thereβs no first ruling on a particular point of law
If judgeβs own view does not contradict any widespread public opinion < β > judge may use their own view when deciding a case
(Note that the second principle is a biconditional because of the βand only thenβ. So if a judgeβs own view DOES contradict widespread public opinion, then the judge may NOT use their own view when deciding a case.)
The correct answer will involve either a situation in which there is an original ruling on a point of law, or there isnβt.
If there is, then the conclusion will involve a judge following the precedent because the original ruling isnβt contrary to basic moral values of society.
If there isnβt precedent, then the conclusion will involve either (1) a judge following their own view because it doesnβt contradict widespread public opinion or (2) a judge NOT following their own view because it does contradict widespread public opinion
Analysis by Kevin_Lin
Of the rulings described below, βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ
Judge Swoboda is ββββββββββ ββββ β βββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββββ β ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββββ
Judge Valenzuela decides, ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ β ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββ βββββββ
Judge Levinsky sets β βββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ β βββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ
Judge Watanabe must ββββββ β ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ
Judge Balila rules βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ