Astrophysicist: Gamma ray bursts (GRBs)—explosions of powerful radiation from deep space—have traditionally been classified as either "short" or "long," terms that reflect the explosion's relative duration. ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ██ █████ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ █ █████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ █████ ███████████
The astrophysicist concludes gamma ray bursts (GRBs) should no longer be called “short” or “long.” Why not? Because one recent GRB lasted a long time, but was more like a short GRB in every other way.
The astrophysicist assumes there’s no use in labeling GRBs “short” or “long” if some GRBs are characteristic of the opposite type in every other way. In particular, this means assuming the “short” and “long” labels would only be useful if they always indicate properties of a GRB besides its actual duration.
The conclusion of the astrophysicist's ████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
No other GRBs ████ ███████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████████
The classification of ████ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ████████ ██████
Properties other than ████████ ███ ████ █████████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████
GRBs cannot be ██████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ██████ ██████ ████ ██████ █████
Descriptive labels are ██████ ████████ ████ ██████████████ ██████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ █████ ████