PT150.S3.Q4 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The author hypothesizes that the reason Bach is remembered is that he was such a prolific composer. This is based on the fact that Bach wrote more than a thousand full compositions, which the author believes would inevitably have resulted in some outstanding compositions that would survive for a long time.

The author assumes that there is no other explanation for why Bach is remembered.

This provides evidence that being a prolific composer is not enough to make one remembered. This calls into question the author’s explanation for why Bach is remembered.

The author never suggested that writing a smaller number of compositions would make it impossible to be highly regarded or remembered. The author’s theory is just that writing a lot of compositions can make one remembered.

The author acknowledges that Bach could have written many mediocre compositions. But, the author believes that at least some were outstanding, they could allow Bach to be remembered.

We don’t need to know the exact number of compositions. We still know that he wrote more than a thousand full compositions, which is a large number.

The author never suggested that having a high ratio of outstanding works to mediocre works could never be a reason someone is remembered. The author is simply arguing that in Bach’s case, that explanation doesn’t apply.

PrepTest 150 - Section 3 - Question 4

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action