Through years of excavations and careful analysis of her finds around Krasnyi Yar in Kazakhstan, archaeologist Sandra Olsen has assembled what may be evidence of the earliest known people to have domesticated and ridden horses, a momentous development in human history. βββ
βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββ
Data from which one of βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ
tabulation of the ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββ β βββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ
This would be helpful to evaluate Olsenβs hypothesis because (A) would be evidence bearing on whether horses were used mainly for food vs. mainly for some other purpose. If the proportion of horse bones that were butchered to those that were untouched were very high, that would suggest horses were mainly used for food (βbutcheredβ in this context means cut up into pieces, which is evidence of use for food). But if the proportion of horse bones to untouched bones were very low, that would suggest horses were used for something besides food (which would support Olsenβs hypothesis).
tabulation of the ββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββ β βββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ
Itβs not clear the relative proportion of sheep and goats to horses has any bearing on Olsenβs hypothesis. If there were a lot of goats/sheep compared to horses, that doesnβt suggest either way whether horses were ridden by the Botai.
determination of the ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ
Itβs not clear that the number of other tribes at the same time as the Botai compared to the number of modern hunting tribes in the same area is relevant. If there were a lot more/fewer tribes in the past, that doesnβt provide any reason to think horses were or were not ridden by the Botai.
analysis of mortality ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββ
Itβs not clear that mortality patterns in other animals affect Olsenβs hypothesis. Other animals may have been used for food; that doesnβt suggest horses were or were not ridden.
analysis of the βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββββ
Itβs not clear that the proportion of human remains to horse remains is relevant. We know that some horse remains were found arranged in burial sites with human remains. Whatβs important is the fact the horse remains were arranged, not the number of human bones found with the horse bones.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.