PT151.S3.Q24 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that people who have university degrees are more likely to live in a household with a cat than a household with a dog. This is based on the following poll results:

47% of households with a cat had at least one person with a university degree.

38% of households with a dog had at least one person with a university degree.

The author overlooks the possibility that the number of houses with dogs is significantly higher than the number of houses with cats, such that 38% of dog-houses might be a greater number than 47% of cat-houses. And if this is the case, a person with a university degree might be more likely to be part of a dog-house than a cat-house.

This possibility doesn’t hurt the argument, because we have statistics about households with cats and households with dogs. Households that have both would simply be counted as both a household with a cat and a household with a dog. These households are not excluded.

This describes an assumption of the argument, because if there were significantly more households with a dog than ones with a cat, that opens the possibility 38% of the dog-houses is a greater number than 47% of the cat-houses.

The argument concerns only people who have university degrees. What proportion have houses with at least one person without a university degree has no bearing on the argument.

The argument concerns the likelihood that someone with a university degree is to live in a household with a cat vs. a household with a dog. Who makes decisions on pets in these households has no bearing on the argument.

The argument does not assert any causal relationship. The author doesn’t say that having a degree causes one to get a cat or a dog or vice versa. So the possibilty that things can be correlated without being causally connected has no impact on the argument.

Question

49% of people who answer get this correct

This is a very difficult question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 154

162

75% 169

Question Stem Tags

Flaw or descriptive weakening

Stimulus Tags

Math

Sampling

Popularity Avg. score

16%

159

49%

165

158

155

26%

157

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 151 - Section 3 - Question 24

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action