Psychologist: Conclusion Thinking can occur without language. ███████████ ████ ████████████ ████ ███████████████ ████████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ █████████████ █ ███████ ██████████ █ █████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ███ ████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ██████████████ ██ █ ███████ █████ █████ █████ █ ███████ ██ █ ███████ █████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████
The Psychologist concludes that thinking can occur without language. Why? Because infants with no knowledge of language can spot irregularities in pictures. To do this, the infants probably compare the picture with an internal representation of what is typical, and so a thought of what is typical must exist in the infants’ minds.
The statement in the last sentence is a sub-conclusion used to support the Psychologist’s main conclusion.
The statement that a thought ██ █ ███████ █████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████████
It is a ██████████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ██ █ ███████ ██ ███████ █ ████ ███████ ███████████
It is attributed ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████████
It is the ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████████
It is used ██ ██████ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████
It states the ██████████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████████