PT153.S2.Q12 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

Regina claims that the additional revenue from bridge leases will not reduce shortfalls in other budget areas. Why? Because the additional revenue will be allocated to the transportation budget.

Amal argues that the additional revenue will reduce shortfalls in other budget areas. Why? Because allocating the revenue to transportation will free up existing transportation funds for other budget areas.

We need a statement Regina and Amal disagree on. They disagree on whether the new revenue from leases will help reduce other budget shortfalls. Regina thinks that the new revenue will not reduce shortfalls since it will be allocated to transportation. Amal thinks that the new revenue will reduce shortfalls indirectly by freeing up existing transportation funds for other uses.

Both speakers agree with this statement. Both Regina and Amal take for granted that shortfalls in other budget areas will exist, they're just debating whether the new funds will reduce those shortfalls.

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. The question is about what budget areas will be impacted by the new funds, not the adequacy of transportation funding.

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. Neither speaker makes a value judgement about what should or should not be done, they only discuss what they think is likely to happen.

Regina and Amal disagree on this statement. Regina disagrees that the new funds will help other budget areas, so we can infer that she thinks no transportation funds will be reallocated. Amal agrees that the new funds will help other budget areas indirectly by freeing up existing funds.

Neither speaker expresses an opinion on this statement. We can’t assume that the speakers agree or disagree with this, because neither one addresses the overall financial impact of this plan.

PrepTest 153 - Section 2 - Question 12

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action