PT153.S2.Q15 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The more individual members of a species we study, the better we understand that species. The better we understand the behavior and ecological niche of an endangered species, the better our chance is of saving that species.

Therefore, as a species becomes more endangered, the more difficult it is to acquire the understanding to save that species.

We don’t know whether many endangered species will in fact become extinct. We only know that our chance of saving an endangered species increases if we better understand that species.

We don’t know whether it’s impossible to save some endangered species if their habitats continue to be reduced. The stimulus does not address the reduction of wildlife habitats.

If the number of individual members of a species causally contributes to our understanding of that species, which in turn causally contributes to our chance of saving that species, it must be that the fewer the individuals left to study, the less our chance is of saving that species.

We don’t know whether acquiring knowledge is more important than taking action in order to save an endangered species. We only know that our chances of saving an endangered species increases as our understanding of that species increases.

PrepTest 153 - Section 2 - Question 15

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action