Minh: Support This film directorβs newest works are very predictable. ββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ β ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββ
ββββββββ βββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ β ββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ
Minh believes that a certain director is βpillagingβ his past work, but not getting much value from doing so. In support, Minh points out that the directorβs recent films are very predictable, and in fact are nothing more than repetitions of his past films.
Natalie argues that the directorβs recent work is actually original, despite their similarity to past films. How so? Because the director is using the same elements to create new works (rather than just repeating past works).
We need to find a point of agreement about the directorβs recent films. Minh and Natalie agree that the recent films are very similar to the directorβs previous films.
Analysis by AlexandraNash
The dialogue most strongly supports βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ
They share many ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ
They constitute evidence ββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ
They are nothing ββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ
They are less ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ
They provide evidence ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ