Self-study
Laurie: Support In a democracy, public art should bring people together either by expressing a consensus on a subject or by helping people to reconcile their differences and to recognize that no single opinion is definitive. █████ ████████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████
█████ ██ ██████ ████ █████████ █████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ██████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ██ ███ ███████████ █████ ██ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ████
Speaker 1 Summary
Laurie concludes that contemporary public art has failed to achieve its purpose. Its purpose in a democracy is to express a consensus on a subject or to help people reconcile their differences. Contemporary public art only creates bitterness among people.
Speaker 2 Summary
Elsa has a different take on what public art should do. She thinks it should emphasize radically different opinions. Elsa asserts that it’s impossible for art to either express a consensus on a subject or to help people to reconcile their differences.
Objective
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree on what public art should do. Laurie thinks it should help bring people together. Elsa thinks it should emphasize different opinions.
Analysis by Kevin_Lin
22.
Laurie's and Elsa's statements provide ███ ████ ███████ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ████████ █████
a
what types of ██████ ███ ███ ████ ██████████████ ██ ████████████ ███████████
b
whether it is ████████ ██ █ █████████ ██ ██████ ██████ ███ ████ ██████ ████ █████████ █████████ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ███████
c
what the criterion ██ ███████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ █ █████████ ██████ ██
d
whether contemporary public ███ ███████ ████ ████████
e
whether it is ████ ███ ████████████ ██████ ███ ██ ████ ███████ █ █████████ ██ █ ███████