Employee: Vernon's behavior in last month's incident was certainly unprofessional enough that our company was justified in firing him. ███ ███████ ██████████████ █████████ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ████████████ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ █████
The author concludes that the company must give Vernon his job back. This is based on the fact that several higher-ranking employees engaged in behavior just as unprofessional as Vernon did, but haven’t been fired. In addition, the company should be consistent.
The author overlooks the fact that another consistent course of action would be to keep Vernon fired, but to also fire the other employees who engaged in unprofesional behavior.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ █ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████
illicitly using a ███ ████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████
confusing behavior that ██ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████
offering as its ███████ ████████ █ ███████ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████████
treating behavior that ███ █████████ ██████ ██ █ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ████ ██████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████████
inferring that one ████████ ████████ ██ █ ███████ ██ █████████ ███████ ███████████ ███████ ███████ █████████ ████████