PT154.S3.P4.Q21 > Analytics

Hide analysis

In the absence of international statutes prohibiting nations from causing each other environmental damage, scholars of international environmental law typically focus on trying to identify and clarify norms of "customary international law": that body of commonly accepted—but not formalized—legal principles that is manifest in the behavior of nations toward one another. ███

Intro to Topic · Environmental principles considered as norms of customary international law

There's no explicitly written international law that prohibit countries from engaging in certain behaviors that could damage the environment of another country. So scholars have to look at the unwritten principles to understand how countries behave in this regard.

███ █████████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██ ███████████ █████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ████ ███ ██ █████ ██████████ ██████████ █████████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ████████ ██████████ ██████ █████ ███████ ████ █████ ███████████ █████████████ ████ ██████ █████ ████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████████ ██████████ █████ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ████ ██ █████████████ █████

Two Principles/Norms · 1. Don't harm your neighbors; 2. Take due care to avoid risk of (1)

Say you and I are countries. We share a river. I'm upstream of you. (1) would mean that I tell my industries not to dump pollutants into the river. (2) would mean that I tell my industries to think about what other harms might occur and take precautions to prevent them from occurring.

██ ████████ ███████ █ █████ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █ ████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ █████████████ ██████ ████████ ██ █████████████ █████████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ███

Criterion · Principals are norms only if nations follow them

Apparently there's a distinction between a "principle" (like the two stated in the previous paragraph) and a "norm" which is defined here as what nations actually do. So if a nation doesn't abide by the principle, then it's not a "norm." Okay... where is this going?

██ █████ ████████ ████ █████████ ███████ ██ █████████ █████████████ █████████████ ████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ █████████████ ████ ███ ███ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ████████ ██████████ █████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ █████ ████ █████████████ ████████ ███ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ ██████ ████ ██████████

Application of Criterion · Nations do not abide by these principles

E.g., they let pollutants travel downstream to their neighbors. So these principles are not norms.

████ ██████ ███████ ████ ██████ █████ ██ █████ █████████████ ████████ ████ ████████████ █████████ ███████ ██ ██████ █████ ██████████ █████ ████████ ██████████ █████████ █████████████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ █████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██████████ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ ████████ █████████████ █████████████ ███████ █████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ████ ███████ ███ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ███████ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ███

Facts · Nations and scholars both say one thing and do another

Nations say one thing and do another. They speak as if these are norms but they do not behave accordingly. Scholars also say one thing and do another. They say they based their research on what nations do but actually debate more about what nations say.

Sub-Conclusion / Major Premise · These "norms" are not actually norms

Author claims that these so called "norms" are just ideological systems.

██ █████ ██ ████ █████ █████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ███ █ ████ █████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████████████ █████████████ █████ ███ ████████████ █████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ████ █████ ████ █████████████ ████████ ███ ██████ █████████████ ██████ ████ █████████████ █████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████ ███

Main Conclusion · Scholars should stop studying international court decisions

Most environmental disputes are being resolved directly via negotiations and treaties, not by going to international court.

██ █████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ████ ████████ ████ ████████████ ████ █████████ ████ ████ ██████ █████████████ █████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██████ ███ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ █████████████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ ████████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ █████ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ██ █████████████ ████████

Main Conclusion · Scholars should study negotiations and treaties

And how environmental principles inform those negotiations and treaties.

Passage Style

Critique or debate

Problem-analysis

21.

Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████

Question Type

Main point

In a Problem-Analysis passage, if the author advocates for a solution, the main point typically captures that solution. Here, the author advocates for scholars to focus on international treaties and direct negotiations rather than court decisions when studying international environmental disputes. Let’s look for an answer that captures the author’s recommendation.

Preventing transboundary harm ██ █████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ████████ █████████ ██ ████ ████████

This doesn’t capture the author’s recommendation that scholars focus on international treaties and direct negotiations rather than court decisions when studying international environmental disputes.

International law is ██ ███████████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ████████

Although the author agrees with (B), this doesn’t capture the author’s recommendation that scholars focus on international treaties and direct negotiations rather than court decisions when studying international environmental disputes.

12%

Many scholars believe ████ ███████ █████████████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████████ ██████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████ ████████

The debate regarding █████ █████████████ █████ ███ ████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ███ ██ ████████ ██ ████████ █████ ███████ ████ ████████ ████ █████████ █████████████ █████

Solutions to international █████████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ████████████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ████

This best captures the author’s recommendation that scholars focus on international treaties and direct negotiations rather than court decisions when studying international environmental disputes.

76%

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 154 - Section 3 - Passage 4 - Question 21

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 154 - Section 3 - Passage 4 - Question 21

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?