In the absence of international statutes prohibiting nations from causing each other environmental damage, scholars of international environmental law typically focus on trying to identify and clarify norms of "customary international law": that body of commonly accepted—but not formalized—legal principles that is manifest in the behavior of nations toward one another. ███
Intro to Topic ·Environmental principles considered as norms of customary international law
There's no explicitly written international law that prohibit countries from engaging in certain behaviors that could damage the environment of another country. So scholars have to look at the unwritten principles to understand how countries behave in this regard.
Two Principles/Norms ·1. Don't harm your neighbors; 2. Take due care to avoid risk of (1)
Say you and I are countries. We share a river. I'm upstream of you. (1) would mean that I tell my industries not to dump pollutants into the river. (2) would mean that I tell my industries to think about what other harms might occur and take precautions to prevent them from occurring.
Criterion ·Principals are norms only if nations follow them
Apparently there's a distinction between a "principle" (like the two stated in the previous paragraph) and a "norm" which is defined here as what nations actually do. So if a nation doesn't abide by the principle, then it's not a "norm." Okay... where is this going?
Facts ·Nations and scholars both say one thing and do another
Nations say one thing and do another. They speak as if these are norms but they do not behave accordingly. Scholars also say one thing and do another. They say they based their research on what nations do but actually debate more about what nations say.
Main Conclusion ·Scholars should study negotiations and treaties
And how environmental principles inform those negotiations and treaties.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
26.
The author's mention of harmful ██████████ ████████ █████████████ ███████ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████ █████████ █████████ ██
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
To understand the purpose, read the sentence before the one mentioning harmful pollutants. This makes clear that the author mentions harmful pollutants crossing borders as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law.
a
an example of ███ ████████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██████████ █████████ █████████████ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ █████████████ ██████
The pollutants are mentioned as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law. The author never claims that debates about customary international law don’t give enough attention to environmental issues.
b
a means of ██████████ ████ ████████ ███████████ ██ ████████ █████████████ █████████████ ████ ██ ██████
The pollutants are mentioned as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law. The author never argues that we need stronger enforcement of environmental laws.
The pollutants are mentioned as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law. Treaties and negotiations aren’t mentioned until P3.
The pollutants are mentioned as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law. The author doesn’t suggest in P2 that concerns about the environment are justified.
e
support for the ████████ █████ ████ ███████ █████████████ █████████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████ ██████████ █████ ██ █████████ █████████████ ███
This is the best answer. The pollutants are mentioned as an example of how nations don’t follow the two principles that are purported to be norms of environmental law. And because the nations don’t follow those principles, they do not meet the requirement that nations actually abide by a principle in order for that principle to be a part of customary international law.
Difficulty
59% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%151
159
75%167
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
4%
155
b
13%
158
c
17%
157
d
6%
157
e
59%
165
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.