Martin: I have heard it argued that, because changes in diet and exercise rarely result in weight loss, doctors should stop advising their patients to eat less and exercise more. βββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββ
Martin concludes that a particular shortcoming (benefit of weight loss is rare) of an action (diet and exercise advice) is not enough to cease an action (doctors ceasing advice to eat less and exercise more), because there are other benefits to the action.
Which one of the following ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββ
The fact that ββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββ β ββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββ β ββββββ ββ ββββββββ
Mismatched premise. (A) concludes that a potential failure/shortcoming (probably wonβt win) is not enough to avoid an action (participating in marathon), like the stimulus, but the stimulus supports this by claiming that there are other benefits to the action, whereas (A) supports this by claiming that the failure (not winning) may not happen.
The fact that βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββββ β ββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββ
This argument concludes that a particular failure (couldnβt solve the problem) is not enough to deem something (engineerβs work) a failure overall, because there are other benefits to that thing.
The fact that βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ β βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ
Mismatched premise. (C) concludes that a particular failure (unsuccessful) is not enough to cease an action (gardening), like the stimulus, but the stimulus supports this by claiming that there are other benefits to the action, whereas (C) supports this by suggesting that the shortcoming will reverse with time.
The fact that βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ
Mismatched premise. (D) concludes that a particular shortcoming (costing more than expected) is not enough to cease an action (construction), like the stimulus, but the stimulus supports this by claiming that there are other benefits to the action, whereas (D) supports this by claiming that the shortcoming was anticipated as a possibility.
The fact that βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββ β ββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ
Mismatched premise and conclusion. The stimulus establishes that an action (advice) usually fails to yield a certain desired outcome (weight loss). (E) is missing this failure.